Welcome to Call to Decision
|
AGENDA 21: THE END OF WESTERN
CIVILIZATION By Kathleen
Marquardt Wake-up call,
Part 1 “Global
sustainability requires the
deliberate quest of poverty, reduced
resource consumption and set levels
of mortality control.” -Professor
Maurice King Birth of an
abomination In simple terms
Agenda
21/Sustainable Development is
the end of civilization as we know
it. It is the end of private
property, the elevation of the
collective over the individual. It
is the redistribution of America’s
wealth to the global elite, it is
the end of the Great American
Experiment and the Constitution.
And, it is the reduction of 85% of
the world’s population. In 1992, twenty
years ago this summer, Agenda
21/Sustainable Development was
unveiled to the world at the UN’s
Earth Summit in Rio. (While Agenda
21 was introduced in June, 1992, it
was already installed as public
policy in communities across the
country as early as 1987.) In his opening
remarks at the ceremonies at the
Earth Summit, Maurice Strong stated:
“The concept of national
sovereignty has been an immutable,
indeed sacred, principle of
international relations. It is a
principle which will yield only
slowly and reluctantly to the new
imperatives of global environmental
cooperation. It is simply not
feasible for sovereignty to be
exercised unilaterally by individual
nation states, however powerful. The
global community must be assured of
environmental security.” If this
is true, then he and his cohorts
must be even more against individual
sovereignty. Keep this quote in mind
as you read about Agenda 21. George H.W.
Bush was in Rio for the ceremonies
and graciously signed on for America
so that our Congress did not have to
spend the time reviewing the treaty
and learning then what dastardly
deeds were in store for us -- that
protecting the environment would be
used as the basis for controlling
all human activity and
redistributing our wealth. Definitions of
Sustainable Development U.N. definition
of Sustainable Development: “meeting
today’s needs without compromising
future generations to meet their own
needs.” In actuality,
Sustainable Development is not
sustainable unless the population
actually is reduced by the 85%
called for by the globalists. The
true purpose of Sustainable
Development and all of its
policies is the control of all
aspects of human life -- economic,
social and environmental (see 3 Es
of Sustainable Development further
into article). Here is how the
UN described Agenda 21 in one of its
own publications in a 1993 article
entitled “Agenda 21: The Earth
Summit Strategy to Save our
Planet:” “Agenda 21proposes
an array of actions which are
intended to be implemented by EVERY
person on Earth…it calls for
specific changes in the activities
of ALL people… Effective execution
of Agenda 21 will REQUIRE a profound
reorientation of ALL humans, unlike
anything the world has ever
experienced.” So George H.W.
Bush signed the Rio Accord and a
year later Clinton established his
President’s Council for
Sustainable Development which would
render the guidelines of Agenda 21
into public policy to be
administered by the federal
government via all departments. In
doing this, Bush and Clinton set up
Agenda 21 as ruling authority, i.e,
implementing a U.N. plan to become
U.S. policy across the whole nation
and into every county and town. And
every succeeding president has fully
endorsed and implemented Agenda 21
through every department of the
federal government. If one were to
research the source of U.S. policy,
one would find that much of our
policy of the last few decades is
the outcome of agreements we have
entered into via treaties with the
U.N. And that policy has trickled,
no gushed, down into every state and
into almost every other jurisdiction
-- county, city, town -- in the
nation; Sustainable Development is
the official policy of our country
even though many citizens are yet
ignorant of its existence. And this
policy encompasses an entire
economic and social agenda. So what is
Sustainable Development? According to
its authors, the objective of
Sustainable Development is to
integrate economic, social and
environmental policies in order to
achieve reduced consumption, social
equity, and the preservation and
restoration of biodiversity (the 3Es
of sustainability). They insist that
every societal decision be based on
environmental impact, focusing on
three components; global land use,
global education, and global
population control and reduction. Look at these
words, they are part of the new
vocabulary: Free trade,
open space, smart growth, smart
food, smart buildings, regional
planning, walkable, bikeable,
foodsheds, viewsheds, consensus,
partnerships, preservation,
stakeholders, land use,
environmental protection,
development, diversity, visioning,
social justice, heritage, carbon
footprints, comprehensive planning,
critical thinking, community
service, regional planning. All of these
words are part of the Newspeak, the
altering of the English language as
a tool to promote a global
government through a diabolical
agenda called Agenda 21. In fact,
the world will be retooled from top
to bottom through this agenda and
using the new vocabulary. This is
not just policy but a complete
restructuring of life as we know it.
We not only will be taught how we
must live, but where we are allowed
to live; taught how to think and
what is acceptable thinking; told
what job we will be allowed to have;
taught how we can worship and what
we will be allowed to worship; and
we will be brainwashed into
believing that the individual must
cede all to the collective. Private
property will be a sin that will be
eradicated as will be free-market
economics which will be replaced by
public private partnerships and a
planned central economy.
Individualism will be rooted out and
social justice will rule the land.
Social justice is described as the
right and opportunity of all people "to
benefit equally from the resources
afforded us by society and the
environment." – in other
words, the redistribution of wealth.
This will be achieved through an
organizational structure of land use
controls; control of energy and
energy production; control of
transportation; control of industry;
control of food production; control
of development; control of water
availability; and control of
population size and growth. And all
of this will be decreed under the
guise of environmental protection. The 3 Es of
Sustainable Development The 3Es of
sustainability which make up the
Sustainable Development logo
consists of three connecting circles
labeled Social Equity; Economic
Prosperity; and Ecological
Integrity. These Es together
encompass every aspect of human
life. First E -
Social Equity Social Equity
is based on a demand for “social
justice.” -- in non-Newspeak,
redistribution of the wealth. Social justice
is described as the right and
opportunity of all people “to
benefit equally from the resources
afforded us by society and the
environment.” Redistribution of
wealth. Private property is a social
injustice since not everyone can
build wealth from it. National
sovereignty is a social injustice.
Universal health care is a social
injustice. [To understand Agenda 21,
click
here] Equity is a
system of “social justice” that
works to abolish the American
concept of equal justice in order to
pursue the globalist ideal of the
“common good.” Individuals
rights must be abolished for the
good of the collective, just as in
Communism; in fact, Karl Marx was
the first person to use the term
social justice. Social justice is an
unnatural leveling of all wealth
(other than that of the global
elites); no one person is supposed
to profit more than another. Second E -
Economic Prosperity From
Wikipedia comes this discussion of
economic prosperity promoted under
Sustainable Development: Economic growth
is often seen as essential for
economic prosperity, and indeed is
one of the factors that is used as a
measure of prosperity. The Rocky
Mountain Institute has put forth an
alternative point of view, that
prosperity does not require growth,
claiming instead that many of the
problems facing communities are
actually a result of growth, and
that sustainable development
requires abandoning the idea that
growth is required for prosperity.
The debate over whether economic
growth is necessary for, or at odds
with, human prosperity, has been
active at least since the
publication of Our Common Future
in 1987, and has been pointed to as
reflecting two opposing worldviews. Keep in mind
that almost every concept under
Agenda 21 is written in Newspeak --
words often have the opposite
meanings of those in your Webster
Dictionary so that the general
public might be deceived, at least
for a time (and it has been).
Economic prosperity under Agenda 21
is anything but prosperity -- other
than for the global elites who are
controlling the system. It is
economic ruin for the ordinary
people of the entire globe. Agenda 21
proponents would have you believe
that all of the wealth in the world
was made on the backs of the poor
and that the only way that this
inequity can be corrected is to
redistribute that wealth. While they
claim that the wealth must be taken
from the American middle class and
given to the poor of the world, in
actuality the money will be taken
from that American middle class and
given to the global elite (as if
they didn’t control most of the
world’s wealth already -- but that
is not the issue; it is to reduce us
to slaves at best). The poor, in
Africa and other parts of the world,
will never see a dime of the
redistributed wealth, they are only
the pretense for taking our money. Agenda 21
encompasses the so-called free trade
movement that created both NAFTA and
Public/Private Partnerships which
were incorporated into a
government-driven economy called
“corporatism.” These
public/private partnerships are
nothing more than government
sanctioned monopolies -- Mussolini
style economics. To understand
the power of the transformation of
society under sustainable
development, consider this quote
from the UN’s Biodiversity Treaty
(which also was introduced at the
Rio Earth Summit: “Nature has
an integral set of different values
(cultural, spiritual and material)
where humans are one strand in
nature’s web and all living
creatures are considered equal.
Therefore the natural way is the
right way and human activities
should be molded along nature’s
rhythms.” This quote says
it all; that we humans are nothing
special – just one strand in the
nature of things or, put another
way, humans are simply biological
resources. No better than slugs or
dung. In fact, in the eye of the
globalist, we are of less value than
slugs or dung. Their policy is to
oversee any issue in which man
interacts with nature – which, of
course, is literally everything.
This is necessary, they say, because
humans only defile nature. And private
property ownership and control,
along with individual and national
sovereignty, are main targets of
Sustainable Development. Consider
this quote from the report of the
UN’s Habitat I conference:
|