Welcome to Call to Decision
Subject: browns face more charges...
so much for the Bill of Rights, LOL LOL LOL. We should print on toilet
paper for GSA
--- In citizensoftheUSofA@
yahoogroups.
com , Ralph Kermit Winterrowd 2nd <ralph@... wrote:
Attachment: Excerpt from the 1946 APA Congressional Record.
Hopefully this will pass the Yahoo limit on 1 Meg - if not will have
to delete one of the pages.
"Truth is the cry of all, but few enter the game."
Unfortunately the Browns are in the again in the sights of the
Department of Justice with more charges remaining clueless as to where
the real truth lies.
Many supporters of the Browns are still stuck on the "Show me the
Law" mode and have no understanding of the coup d'etat of our
constitutional Republic by the entry of the "Administrative State"
being the headless fourth branch of government confirmed conclusively
in many places but clearly emerging "legally" in the 1946 APA and
denoted clearly in the Congressional Record of the 1946 Administrative
Procedure Act.
These "agencies" liar exists only in the Federal Register as mandated
by the Public Statutes at Large being the Federal Register Act of 1935
as amended and the 1946 APA Act as amended codified today in 5 U.S.C.
chapters 5-9 [sections 500, et seq.]. Only in the Federal Register do
we get any information on these demons from the Abyss of Hell.
As to the commercial solution that the Browns tried in court is
dancing with the Devil. No way to win.
Yes, there is a higher Power, but tis a good thing to learn how to
cast stones with a sling with an accurate aim to kill the aggressor
(agencies).
Ralph
============
=========
=========
===
http://www.cmonitor
.com/apps/
pbcs.dll/
article?AID=
/20090220/
FRONTPAGE/
902200304
Browns face conspiracy, arms counts
Couple arrested in standoff over taxes
By argot Sanger-Katz
KEN WILLIAMS / Monitor file
Ed and Elaine Brown
Zoom
Purchase Photos Online
Sixteen months after their armed standoff with federal officials ended
in a peaceful, undercover arrest, Ed and Elaine Brown were back in New
Hampshire yesterday to face weapons and conspiracy charges for their
activities.
If found guilty, the couple could receive what amount to life
sentences. Just one charge, for possession of destructive devices,
carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 30 years in prison.
The Browns, who were convicted of tax-related felonies in January
2007, fled authorities and holed up in their fortified and well-
provisioned Plainfield home for nearly nine months. They entertained
guests, accumulated weapons, spoke with news reporters and threatened
violence against any agent who tried to arrest them.
An 11-count indictment unsealed yesterday accuses the Browns of
conspiring with supporters to interfere with arrest attempts and
stockpile weapons and homemade bombs. The indictment describes pipe
bombs, exploding rifle targets, improvised booby trap guns and cans of
gunpowder wrapped with nails. In testimony during the trial of several
supporters last year, federal agents described finding Ed Brown's
fingerprints on several of the devices, which were scattered
strategically around the house near detonation cords, matches and high-
powered rifles.
Throughout their tax trial and the standoff, the Browns challenged the
authority of the federal government, saying repeatedly that no law
required them to pay taxes and that they were not subject to federal
jurisdiction.
During their separate arraignments in Concord yesterday, the couple
maintained their positions. Though they were not allowed to speak to
each other before the hearings, they both rejected appointed counsel,
refused to offer pleas and expressed their view that the indictment
was invalid.
"I am not the person on this indictment," Elaine Brown, 68, told
federal Magistrate Judge James Muirhead yesterday. "I do not plan on
taking part in any proceeding on it whatsoever."
Elaine Brown, who appeared in a green prison uniform and slip-on
sneakers, looked transformed by her incarceration. Her previously
coifed brown hair was gray and cut short. She wore no makeup, and she
appeared to have lost weight. In letters to supporters posted online,
she has complained about the prison food.
After Elaine Brown entered the courtroom, she began writing on papers
at the defense table. Muirhead later read the papers and described
them as an offer of a promissory bond of $1 billion and a "private
offset bond" of $2 billion "so she and her husband can go free."
Muirhead said he could not accept them.
Though she was seated next to Bjorn Lange, a federal public defender
who assisted her in the final two days of her tax trial, Elaine Brown
told Muirhead that she did not wish to have a lawyer. Lange, who
avoided calling her by name, agreed to serve as her standby counsel
and recommended that Muirhead enter a plea of not guilty on her behalf.
"I'm satisfied that the woman beside me has sufficiently understood,"
he told Muirhead near the end of the hearing.
'A higher law'
Ed Brown, 66, similarly rejected the court's authority, refusing to
agree that he understood the constitutional rights that Muirhead
described. He rejected the assistance of Michael Iacopino, a
Manchester attorney who was appointed to assist him, though he said
that he would accept a "council" of legal advisers.
"It's not the type of law that we operate under," Ed Brown said. "It's
a higher law."
Ed Brown appeared in court in leg shackles, wearing a neon orange
Strafford County jail uniform with his familiar gray mustache and
glasses. For most of the hearing, he sat with his hands clasped in his
lap, raising his eyebrows, scrunching his face and shrugging as
Muirhead asked him questions. Like his wife, he unsuccessfully
suggested a bond in exchange for their freedom, but Ed Brown offered
more: $5 billion.
--- In citizensoftheUSofA@
Attachment: Excerpt from the 1946 APA Congressional Record.
Hopefully this will pass the Yahoo limit on 1 Meg - if not will have
to delete one of the pages.
"Truth is the cry of all, but few enter the game."
Unfortunately the Browns are in the again in the sights of the
Department of Justice with more charges remaining clueless as to where
the real truth lies.
Many supporters of the Browns are still stuck on the "Show me the
Law" mode and have no understanding of the coup d'etat of our
constitutional Republic by the entry of the "Administrative State"
being the headless fourth branch of government confirmed conclusively
in many places but clearly emerging "legally" in the 1946 APA and
denoted clearly in the Congressional Record of the 1946 Administrative
Procedure Act.
These "agencies" liar exists only in the Federal Register as mandated
by the Public Statutes at Large being the Federal Register Act of 1935
as amended and the 1946 APA Act as amended codified today in 5 U.S.C.
chapters 5-9 [sections 500, et seq.]. Only in the Federal Register do
we get any information on these demons from the Abyss of Hell.
As to the commercial solution that the Browns tried in court is
dancing with the Devil. No way to win.
Yes, there is a higher Power, but tis a good thing to learn how to
cast stones with a sling with an accurate aim to kill the aggressor
(agencies).
Ralph
============
http://www.cmonitor
Browns face conspiracy, arms counts
Couple arrested in standoff over taxes
By argot Sanger-Katz
KEN WILLIAMS / Monitor file
Ed and Elaine Brown
Zoom
Purchase Photos Online
Sixteen months after their armed standoff with federal officials ended
in a peaceful, undercover arrest, Ed and Elaine Brown were back in New
Hampshire yesterday to face weapons and conspiracy charges for their
activities.
If found guilty, the couple could receive what amount to life
sentences. Just one charge, for possession of destructive devices,
carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 30 years in prison.
The Browns, who were convicted of tax-related felonies in January
2007, fled authorities and holed up in their fortified and well-
provisioned Plainfield home for nearly nine months. They entertained
guests, accumulated weapons, spoke with news reporters and threatened
violence against any agent who tried to arrest them.
An 11-count indictment unsealed yesterday accuses the Browns of
conspiring with supporters to interfere with arrest attempts and
stockpile weapons and homemade bombs. The indictment describes pipe
bombs, exploding rifle targets, improvised booby trap guns and cans of
gunpowder wrapped with nails. In testimony during the trial of several
supporters last year, federal agents described finding Ed Brown's
fingerprints on several of the devices, which were scattered
strategically around the house near detonation cords, matches and high-
powered rifles.
Throughout their tax trial and the standoff, the Browns challenged the
authority of the federal government, saying repeatedly that no law
required them to pay taxes and that they were not subject to federal
jurisdiction.
During their separate arraignments in Concord yesterday, the couple
maintained their positions. Though they were not allowed to speak to
each other before the hearings, they both rejected appointed counsel,
refused to offer pleas and expressed their view that the indictment
was invalid.
"I am not the person on this indictment," Elaine Brown, 68, told
federal Magistrate Judge James Muirhead yesterday. "I do not plan on
taking part in any proceeding on it whatsoever."
Elaine Brown, who appeared in a green prison uniform and slip-on
sneakers, looked transformed by her incarceration. Her previously
coifed brown hair was gray and cut short. She wore no makeup, and she
appeared to have lost weight. In letters to supporters posted online,
she has complained about the prison food.
After Elaine Brown entered the courtroom, she began writing on papers
at the defense table. Muirhead later read the papers and described
them as an offer of a promissory bond of $1 billion and a "private
offset bond" of $2 billion "so she and her husband can go free."
Muirhead said he could not accept them.
Though she was seated next to Bjorn Lange, a federal public defender
who assisted her in the final two days of her tax trial, Elaine Brown
told Muirhead that she did not wish to have a lawyer. Lange, who
avoided calling her by name, agreed to serve as her standby counsel
and recommended that Muirhead enter a plea of not guilty on her behalf.
"I'm satisfied that the woman beside me has sufficiently understood,"
he told Muirhead near the end of the hearing.
'A higher law'
Ed Brown, 66, similarly rejected the court's authority, refusing to
agree that he understood the constitutional rights that Muirhead
described. He rejected the assistance of Michael Iacopino, a
Manchester attorney who was appointed to assist him, though he said
that he would accept a "council" of legal advisers.
"It's not the type of law that we operate under," Ed Brown said. "It's
a higher law."
Ed Brown appeared in court in leg shackles, wearing a neon orange
Strafford County jail uniform with his familiar gray mustache and
glasses. For most of the hearing, he sat with his hands clasped in his
lap, raising his eyebrows, scrunching his face and shrugging as
Muirhead asked him questions. Like his wife, he unsuccessfully
suggested a bond in exchange for their freedom, but Ed Brown offered
more: $5 billion.