....best summary I've heard yet. If this dude works for the govt. and doesn't have civil service protection; he probably be in big time pooh...............

Here is my take on Failed Presidency (My comments in blue - Phil Hudok

FAILED PRESIDENCY  (Or something much more? Another point of view!)

******************************************************************************

The following is an interesting article and I wonder how long Dr. Hunt can remain at NIH once the powers that be get wind of this article.

Dr. Hunt is a social and cultural anthropologist. He has had nearly 30 years experience in planning, conducting, and managing research in the field of youth studies, and drug and alcohol research. Currently Dr. Hunt is a Senior Research Scientist at the Institute for Scientific Analysis and the Principal Investigator on three National Institutes on Health projects. He is also a writer for American Thinker.

With all these APPOINTMENTS, one must wonder if this guy has very high connections. Just like Ross Perot having made his money in government contracts.

Another Failed Presidency - An article from American Thinker by Geoffrey P. Hunt
Failed? To whom and by what yardstick?

Barack Obama is on track to have the most spectacularly failed presidency since Woodrow Wilson. And as a recent email that I sent out, Wilson lamented that he had UNWITTINGLY destroyed his country. Wilson's alter-ego and handler was Colonel Edward Mandel House, a tool of the big bankers. His book Philip Dru - Administrator was a blueprint for everything we see today including NAFTA. Wilson had great intentions, but intentions don't mean crap when you are mortally infultrated and manipulated. Reagans infultrator and manipulator was Colonel Ollie North. Interesting parallel, don't you think? Colonels are the administrative trench guys!

 

 In the modern era, we've seen several failed presidencies--led by Jimmy Carter and LBJ. Failed presidents have one strong common trait-- they are repudiated, in the vernacular, spat out. Of course, LBJ wisely took the exit ramp early, avoiding a shove into oncoming traffic by his own party. Richard Nixon indeed resigned in disgrace, yet his reputation as a statesman has been partially restored by his triumphant overture to China 20.

But, Barack Obama is failing. Failing big. Failing fast. And failing everywhere: foreign policy, domestic initiatives, and most importantly, in forging connections with the American people. The incomparable Dorothy Rabinowitz in the Wall Street Journal put her finger on it: He is failing because he has no understanding of the American people, then the question is, how did he ever make the cut all the way up to president? There certainly were people like Ron Paul who would have trounced Obama, Hillary, and Biden all rolled into one! But the media and the Republican Party can only play STUDIO WRESTLING. As the studio wrestling continues, you must create more and more outrageous stunts to distract, entertain and delude the pretty much lobotomized public  and may indeed loathe them. Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard says he is failing because he has lost control of his message, and is overexposed. Clarice Feldman of American Thinker produced a dispositive commentary showing that Obama is failing because fundamentally he is neither smart nor articulate; his intellectual dishonesty is conspicuous by its audacity and lack of shame. Crossing the liability line and he will get a successful Hinkley bullet and he IS SMART ENOUGH to know it. (The next part is incredible but Biblical:) Hinkley's father was a close associate of George H.W. Bush. He was also involved in the government's Manchurian Candidate (Project Monarch) program. And these occultists use their own just as Hawaiian Chieftains would throw their virgin daughters into a Volcano.

But, there is something more seriously wrong: How could a new president riding in on a wave of unprecedented promise and goodwill have forfeited his tenure and become a lame duck in six months?  This was entirely predicted by one of the greatest political minds of the century, Webster Tarpley, and his published pre-election is right on the money. Obama's damage is as immense as his tenure will be short. You can't have the former without the latter.  His poll ratings are in free fall. In generic balloting, the Republicans have now seized a five point advantage. This truly is unbelievable. What's going on?  Once a couple of tenants are understood, then it ALL makes sense. DEMS+REPS=DEMOCRAPS. Dems take two steps forward and Reps take one side step.

No narrative. Obama doesn't have a narrative. No, not a narrative about himself. He has a self-narrative, much of it fabricated, Good point...but, fabricated by whom? cleverly disguised or written by someone else. But this self-narrative is isolated and doesn't connect with us. He doesn't have an American narrative that draws upon the rest of us. All successful presidents have a narrative about the American character that intersects with their own where they display a command of history and reveal an authenticity at the core of their personality that resonates in a positive endearing way with the majority of Americans.

We admire those presidents whose narratives not only touch our own, but who seem stronger, wiser, and smarter than we are. Presidents we admire are aspirational peers, even those whose politics don't align exactly with our own: Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, Harry Truman, Ike, and Reagan. Remember, Reagan was an actor. Who better to pick to CHARM the public?

But not this president. It's not so much that he's a phony, knows nothing about economics, and is historically illiterate and woefully small minded for the size of the task--all contributory of course.  It's that he's not one of us. And whatever he is, his profile is fuzzy and devoid of content, like a cardboard cutout Who cut the cardboard? made from delaminated corrugated paper. Moreover, he doesn't command our respect and is unable to appeal to our own common sense. His notions of right and wrong are repugnant and how things work just don't add up. Begs same question  They are not existential. His descriptions of the world we live in don't make sense and don't correspond with our experience.

In the meantime, while we've been struggling to take a measurement of this man, he's dissed just about every one of us--financiers, energy producers, banks, insurance executives, police officers, doctors, nurses, hospital administrators, post office workers, and anybody else who has a non-green job. Hey, he hasn't "dissed" the globalists and many of the "dissed" carpetbaggers. You would be surprised who has been in the globalists pockets for decades. Example: As I pointed out two decades ago, the AFL-CIO, GM President and many others were participating in Builderburg globalists planning meetings. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_Group

Expect Obama to lament at his last press conference in 2012: "For those of you I offended, DECEIVED I apologize. For those of you who were not offended, you just didn't give me enough time; if only I'd had a second term, I could have offended you too."

Mercifully, the Founders at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 devised a useful remedy for such a desperate state--staggered terms for both houses of the legislature and the executive. An equally abominable Congress can get voted out next year. With a new Congress, there's always hope of legislative gridlock until we vote for president again two short years after that. YEA, RIGHT!!!...NEW CONGRESS...WITH DEMOCRAP?

Yes, small presidents do fail, Controlled presidents conceal their controllers  Barack Obama among them. The coyotes howl but the wagon train keeps rolling along.

Margaret Thatcher: "The trouble with Socialism is, sooner or later you run out of other people's money." Woooo! Socialism is bad , but look who is behind the curtain!!! Pay heed to a rare bit of truthful prose in Barry Goldwater's  book, "With No Apologies - The Personal and Political Memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater" and see if the glove fits.

 

Page 278

            Many of the policies advocated by the CFR have been damaging to the cause of freedom and particularly to the United States, but this is not because the members are communist or communist sympathizers. This explanation of our foreign policy reversals is too pat, too simplistic.

            I believe the Council on Foreign Relations and its ancillary elitist groups are indifferent to communism. They have no ideological anchors. In their pursuit of a new world order they are prepared to deal without prejudice with a communist state, a socialist state, a democratic state, monarchy, oligarchy-it's all the same to them.

            Rear Admiral Chester Ward, USN (Retd.), who was a member of the CFR for sixteen years, has written, "This most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common-they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United States." their goal is to impose a benign stability on the quarreling family of nations through merger and consolidation. They see the elimination of national boundaries, the suppression of racial and ethnic loyalties as the most expeditious avenue to world peace.

 

Page 280

 

            The implications in Governor Rockefeller's presentation have become concrete proposals advanced by David Rockefeller's newest international cabal, the Trilateral Commission. Whereas the Council on Foreign Relations is distinctly national in membership, the Trilateral Commission is international. Representation is allocated equally to Western Europe, Japan, and the United States. It is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States.

            Zbigniew Brezezinski and David Rockefeller screened and selected every individual who was invided to participate in shaping and administering the proposed new world order...

            In his book Between Two Ages, published in 1970 by Viking Press, Brezezinski calls for an international community of Japan, Western Europe, and the United States to supervise and guide the under-developed nations of the world. He declares. "National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept." He calls for a rewriting of the American Constitution. He condemns the existing federal system of U.S. Sovereign states as no longer necessary or adequate.

"When you subsidize poverty and failure, you get more of both." - James Dale Davidson, National Taxpayers Union

"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." - Tacitus

"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own."  - Unknown

A liberal is just another dupe of the Illuminati Cabal. A dupe is a dupe, no matter the label. A pure liberal will just get you there more quickly.

With No Apologies,

Phil Hudok  (A former dupe!) Dupe me once, shame on you, dupe me over and over again, shame on me.