Welcome to Call to Decision
Subject: [Fwd: Baby and The Beast: Woe Unto Britain And Its Blended Children]
Yet a new level of debauchery and sacrilege..........not to mention DEMONIC INSANITY!
GOD HELP US !
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Baby and The Beast: Woe Unto Britain And Its Blended Children Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 19:17:35 -0700 From: Resurrecton Comm Center <rnfn@cableone.net> Reply-To: Resurrecton Comm Center <rnfn@cableone.net> Organization: Resurrection News & FAX Network To: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@smtpgate.ndunet.com>
The following message is sent by: Resurrection News - Fax Net & EDS Com-Center Sheila Marie Reynolds/Editor-Publisher c/o Post Office Box #601 Cornville, Arizona (PZ 86325) Christian Constitutional Republic of the united states of America Phone: 928-634-9269 [All calls screened] Fax/FOD [Fax On Demand]: 928-634-1486 Email-Personal/EDS: rnfn@hotmail.com Email-Personal/EDS: rnfn@cableone.net Website: http://myweb.cableone.net/rnfn/ NOTICE: George W. Bush has issued Executive Orders allowing the National Security Agency to read this message and all other e-mail you receive or send---without warning, warrant or notice. Bush has ordered this to be done without any legislative or judicial oversight. You have no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of President Bush and other government officials who are involved in this illegal and unconstitutional activity. ..................................................................................................................................... AMERICA NEEDS A DOCTOR! **** Ron Paul ("Dr. Know") for President - 2008 !! **** ( http://www.RonPaul2008.com ) If not nominated at the convention - we will write in "Ron Paul for President" ..................................................................................................................................... From: "Joe Gillaspie" <jgillaspie@arkansas.net> Subject: Re: Baby and The Beast: Woe Unto Britain And Its Blended Children <http://jesusbewith.us/?p=129> SEMPER FI' Baby and The Beast: Woe Unto Britain And Its Blended Children By JesusBeWithUs Published May 20th, 2008 (MAY 20) Britain crossed the "ultimate boundary" yesterday when the British parliament voted to legalize abominations. Scientists can now legally create "true hybrids," fertilizing animal eggs with human sperm. The nation who scored its noblest victory sixty-three years ago against the Nazis, voted in its own defeat yesterday against a greater enemy: Satan. And the devil danced. The British Parliament voted to allow such mixes since there is a shortage of human eggs for research. A shortage that exists, no doubt, because most women find abhorrent the idea of inseminating one of their own eggs with animal sperm. So British Parliament chose a different route: to allow the reverse and legalize using human sperm to fertilize animal eggs. The base assumption must be that there is no shortage of human sperm, that harvesting sperm doesn't require invasive surgery like harvesting eggs does, or perhaps the implicit value of the male half of reproduction is worth less protection than that of human female eggs. Who knows? In any case, Parliament said that these hybrids are for research only and cannot be transferred into the womb of an animal or a woman. Foolish shortsightedness given: What of artificial wombs? Perhaps not possible now, but given the rate and depravity of science at this point, someone will surely create an artificial womb in the near future. Besides the obvious depravity of such a move, imagine the mockery this would be of God's laws and of the Blessed Virgin herself, who sheltered Christ in her human womb? But Britain is obviously not worried about mocking God's laws, so when an artificial womb appears, someone will use it to birth a hybrid. What about individuals who choose to IGNORE the ban on implantation into a womb? Unless, of course, crime is unknown in Britain, but that's doubtful in light of this, this and this. What about the possibility of hybrid rights group arising? Instead of People for the Ethical Treament of Animals (PETA), what happens when their counterpart arises, the People for the Ethical Treatment of Hybrids (PETH) and they lobby for and win the rights of hybrids? What then Britain? What then, indeed, when walking upon this earth is the first generation of animal hybrid abominations? It will happen. If only to satisfy the perverse curiosity of some sick researcher or the noble cause of some poor, misguided animal rights group. And when it does, old, settled legal issues will have to be dealt with in the new context of hybrid creatures. From a Catholic perspective, ethics were thrown out the window by legalizing the creation of the hybrid itself, so at this point the debate for Britain would be legal, not ethical. We must remember that much behavior that man is capable of is circumscribed either through God's law or man's. Many of these issues have been settled for centuries. For example, technically: Man can procreate with members of his immediate family, but that is forbidden, also with good reason. Man can procreate with many different people, but usually that is frowned upon, and in most Christian societies, a man can only marry one spouse. A man can scream at people as they walk by, but that is considered anti-social behavior in most places. But what if your genome, your very DNA, contains strands from a beast itself, say a monkey? Monkeys engage in all of the behavior above. So what if someone chooses to create a schoolyard of MANKEYS (part-man, part-monkey)? What is immoral or anti-social at that point? Monkeys urinate in public, so why shouldn't a mankey? It's in the mankey's DNA, he was MEANT to be that way. If this argument seems familiar, it's because it is one of the primary arguments of the gay lobby: that no one chooses to be homosexual, it's in their nature, in their DNA so to speak. Therefore if you ban homosexual activities or homosexual marriage, you are legislating or moralizing against a homosexual person's nature, something that they can't change. To legislate against someone's nature is unethical, so homosexual behavior and marriages should be allowed, or so goes the reasoning. OK, let's follow that thinking with the arrival of a hybrid mankey. We've already determined a mankey should be able to urinate in public according to the "someone's nature" argument. What then about forced reproduction upon an unwilling female? Decision time: Monkeys do that, so why not a mankey, it's in their nature. But let's say the nobler side of a mankey comes out, they can talk, and they articulate that they want to abide by rules of human society and want to marry . a monkey. Decision time: is the monkey spouse to be invited to the local school's PTA meeting? Invited to church? Given social insurance benefits? This all may seem silly and in jest but at some point in the future, silly questions like these will no longer be considered silly and have to be answered. Less than fifty years ago it would have been considered silly to debate the merits of legalizing the production of offspring between two men or two women, but it's silly no longer and is written into law in many places. Here's another example, what about slavery? A farmer can own a cow, but can he own a mankey? What if the DNA of the mankey is 51% monkey and 49% human? It's mostly monkey and given that anyone can own a monkey, does the farmer have a valid argument to breed a herd of mankeys and put them to work in a field? Or does a Chinese factory owner have the right to breed a manufacturing plant full of them? You get the point. If God considers homosexuality an abomination (Leviticus 18:22, Romans 1:26-27, 1 Corinthians 6:9-10) or sleeping with beasts an abomination (Lev. 20:15,16), what possibly can He think of what the British Parliament approved yesterday? Britain has chosen to blend its children with beasts. If Satan is dancing today, what is God doing?