Welcome to Call to Decision
Subject: FDIC gearing up for prospect of a large bank failure + dozens of us banks will fail by 2010 .
Given the problems in this economic/financial meltdown, with still hidden off balance sheet statements yet to be revealed, it would make sense that "insured" deposits aren't much safer than so-called uninsured...no?. Like in any Ponzi scheme, those who get out at the top and in time are saved by their prudence and those who don't, are called victims most with no recourse in justice in a crashing, bankrupt system. I don't have the figures at the ready, but I know there is no way the FDIC can or will cover deposits that surpass the amount they have which will only cover a limited number of them. People would be shocked at just how limited that amount is.
Of course the government counterfeiters could toil day and night over their printing presses but hyper inflation and the foreign dumping of treasuries may forbid tons of fiat money at that point. ac
See also
http://www.reuters.com/article/reutersEdge/idUSN0143367820080201
DOZENS OF US BANKS WILL FAIL BY 2010
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/story.aspx?guid=%7B03FBB3D6%2D6F11%2D455A%2D8730%2D04DC7082FEEA%7D&siteid=rss&print=true&dist=printTop
CONSUMER BANKING
.
How risky are uninsured bank deposits? - MarketWatch
By Gail Liberman and Alan Lavine
Last update: 7:30 p.m. EST Feb. 4, 2008
PALM BEACH GARDENS, Fla. (MarketWatch) -- The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. is gearing up for the prospect of a large bank failure. So double-check that all your deposits, including interest, are well within FDIC insurance limits.
The agency seeks comment by April 14 on a proposed rule designed to help it make a quick insurance determination amid an increasingly complex quagmire of FDIC rules and tough-to-figure-out bank accounts.
One section would place a provisional hold on a fraction - say, 10% or so -- of certain account balances at some 159 of the nation's largest banks. The hold could affect some accounts with balances under $100,000.
If you have uninsured deposits at a bank, should you worry? Possibly. Depositors without FDIC coverage lost money in at least two recent failures -- NetBank, Alpharetta, Ga., and Miami Valley Bank, Lakeview, Ohio.
Of $109 million in uninsured deposits at NetBank, nearly 30% has not yet been reimbursed. Of $14 million in uninsured funds at Miami Valley, only 5.9% of uninsured funds, so far, has been reimbursed. All deposits in the most recent failure -- Douglass National Bank, Kansas City, Mo. -- have been reimbursed.
Fortunately, FDIC insurance limits have increased on certain accounts in recent years. Certain retirement accounts, for example, now are insured to $250,000, up from $100,000 per person.
But the tide on FDIC reimbursement of uninsured depositors may have changed in 1991 for the worse. Congress sharply curtailed the FDIC's discretion to extend protection beyond insured deposits. Now the FDIC must enter into the "least costly" transaction when dealing with a troubled bank. So the FDIC won't reimburse uninsured depositors if it means increasing the loss to the deposit insurance fund.
"As a result, uninsured depositors are protected only if a bank acquiring the failed bank will pay more for all of the deposits than it would for insured deposits only," said FDIC spokesman David Barr.
By contrast: "Prior to December 1991, the only time that the insurance limit was imposed was when we could not find a buyer for a troubled bank and had to issue checks to depositors for their uninsured funds. The overwhelming majority of the time, we were successful in finding a buyer."
Big and bigger
Weren't you reassured about our deposit-insurance system with the bailouts of three colossal banks in the past -- Continental Illinois, First Republic and Bank of New England? Each large bank approached an eye-popping $40 billion in assets. Today, however, a bank of that size would not rank in the top 40, FDIC chairman Sheila Bair warned in a speech last year.
FDIC data indicate that as of Sept. 30, there were 65 institutions with assets of $18.5 billion on its list of "problem" institutions. Barr would not elaborate on their sizes. Nor will the FDIC name the institutions.
Institutional Risk Analytics, Torrance, Calif., based on FDIC data from that same date, puts Bank of America Corp. (BAC
as the riskiest big banks. More recently, Managing Director Chris Whalen cited J.P. Morgan, Citigroup and Bank of America as his chief concerns due to their heavier trading activity.
He stresses that there is a 45-day lag time from the close of a quarterly period and the publication of FDIC data. Bank conditions can deteriorate very quickly. Fourth quarter 2007 FDIC data won't be released until late February.
Nevertheless, Whalen doubts that even uninsured depositors at those banks need worry.
"Uncle Sam is not going to let any of them fail," he declared. Some investors, though, could take "haircuts."
Be on guard
So what should you do if you deposit large amounts at a bank?Spouses Gail Liberman and Alan Lavine are syndicated columnists. Their latest book is "Quick Steps to Financial Stability" (Que/Penguin). You can contact them at www.moneycouple.com.
- Know which deposits are FDIC-insured and which aren't. Make certain you're fully covered by visiting www.fdic.gov and clicking on "Deposit insurance." Allow room for accrued interest and provisional holds.
- Know the financial strength of your bank. You can search your bank for free at www.bauerfinancial.com. Besides www.institutionalriskanalytics.com, some other sources of bank safety information include www.FEDFIS.com and www.bankrate.com.
- Consider a service, such as www.cdars.com, which disburses deposits at a number of banks to make sure all are FDIC-insured. Keep good records.
- Take special care with "sweep" accounts, which move money periodically from one account to another. Determine how FDIC insurance would work with your type of account. The FDIC notes that if funds are swept into a deposit in a foreign branch of the bank, normally those funds are not insured by the FDIC or treated as "deposits" under U.S. law. "A depositor should understand the nature of the sweep transaction, how funds are being changed during the course of the business day and the implications of these changes," Barr says. "Sweep account transactions can have a big impact on a customer's status in the event of failure."
==================
http://www.reuters.com/article/reutersEdge/idUSN0143367820080201
DOZENS OF US BANKS WILL FAIL BY 2010