demanding that it remove a
"rainbow" flag from the flagpole that also holds Old
Glory.
"Dear President [Jeffrey M.] Lacker," wrote state Delegate
Bob Marshall, "Flying the homosexual flag just under the
American flag outside Richmond's
building is a serious deficiency of
judgment by your organization."
Marshall said the Federal Reserve policies are supposed to
"contribute to the strength and vitality of the U.S.
,"
but "a flagpole in front of a federal building is not a
commercial or political message board."
"What does flying the homosexual flag, or any other similar
display, have to do with your central banking mission under the
Federal Reserve Act passed by Congress?"
"The Richmond Fed's endorsement of costly, anti-social, immoral
behavior is rejected by 6,000 years of Western religious and moral
teaching. You want the American people to trust your judgment in
matters when your spokesperson celebrates an attack on public
morals? Why?" Marshall continued.
Mr.Lacker, take down that flag!"
Marshall told WND that his letter to the bank must have "set
off a firecracker," because there had been hundreds of
responses via email and the like already.
"This guy has no
business
taking an institution Congress created for financial dealings and
turning it into a political billboard," he said.
Bank spokesman Jim Strader told WND that Marshall's letter had
been delievered and "we are reviewing his letter and we will
respond."
He refused to say what the response would be or when it would
come.
But he said the "pride flag is flying at our bank as a symbol
of our commitment to diversity and inclusion."
He said bank managers got a request from "an employee
group" and the request to fly the flag was approved.
Strader said it coincides with
Barack
Obama's "proclamation" that June is the "Lesbian,
Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month." [my
emphasis-Phyllis]
"This month … marks the 30th anniversary of the emergence
of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, which has had a profound impact on the
LGBT community," Obama said. "Though we have made
strides in combating this devastating disease, more work remains
to be done, and I am committed to expanding access to HIV/AIDS
prevention and care."
Strader refused to respond to questions about whether the
statement of a social agenda was a precedent for the bank, or
whether other employee or interest groups could take advantage of
the forum and proclaim their campaigns, also.
"I can't comment on that," he said.
He said the bank, too, has gotten comments on the "pride
flag" flying in front of the institution assigned to manage
the nation's fiscal policy.
Officials
with the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors refused to reply to
WND requests for comment.
But Marshall said, "This is a celebration of a behavior that
is still a class six felony in Virginia."
This dispute is not the only headache the Federal Reserve could be
facing.
WND
recently reported on a series of grass-roots lawsuits that are
being developed against the Fed.

U.S.
Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas
|
And U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas long has advocated an audit of the
intensely secret organization, as well as a shutdown of its
operations.
The lawsuit plans come from the PatriotStorm organization at its
SuetheFed.com
website. The plan envisions teams of attorneys analyzing
data,
demanding information, verifying damages and arguing court cases.
"Our litigation plan will be loosely patterned after the
tobacco litigation model executed during the 1980s and 1990s; only
far more organized, coordinated and focused in order to provide
shared access of all discovery materials and briefs developed to
all of our network law firms and prosecutors nationwide," the
website explains.
"The litigation activities will be divided among three broad
areas: a) research; b) analysis and dissemination of discovery
materials and briefs, and c) litigation coordination. The company
will recruit several hundred to several thousand highly respected
small to mid-sized litigating law firms to pursue the class action
litigation for their representative plaintiffs (live persons,
companies, municipalities, etc.) residing in their respective
geographic areas."
Congressman Paul long has argued that the Federal Reserve simply
is illegal. Some of his concerns have revolved around Article 1,
Section 8 of the Constitution, which assigns to Congress the right
to coin money.
There is no mention in the Constitution of a central bank, and it
wasn't until the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 that the Fed was
created.
.jpg)
Ben
Bernanke
|
Paul previously has said, "Throughout its nearly 100-year
history, the Federal Reserve has presided over the near-complete
destruction of the United States dollar. Since 1913 the dollar has
lost over 95 percent of its purchasing power, aided and abetted by
the Federal Reserve's loose monetary policy."
And he's proposed repeatedly – and again in this Congress –
the idea of auditing the Fed to determine exactly what it has been
doing and then begin making corrections.
With
a book titled "End the Fed," he's made no secret of
his ultimate goal.
That the Fed is at least partly to blame for the financial
problems that have developed in the U.S. seems not to be in
dispute.
It
was longtime Federal Reserve chairman Ben. S. Bernanke who
admitted as much.
Bernanke said it was the Fed that caused the Great Depression, the
worldwide economic downturn that persisted from 1929 until about
1939. It was the longest and worst depression ever experienced by
the industrialized Western world. While originating in the U.S.,
it ended up causing drastic declines in output, severe
unemployment and acute deflation in virtually every country on
earth. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, "the Great
Depression ranks second only to the Civil War as the gravest
crisis in American history."
At a Nov. 8, 2002,
conference
to honor economist Milton Friedman's 90th birthday, Bernanke, then
a Federal Reserve governor, gave a speech at Friedman's old home
base, the University of Chicago.
After citing how Friedman and a co-author documented the Fed's
continual contraction of the money supply during the Depression
and its aftermath – and the subsequent abandonment of the gold
standard by many nations in order to stop the devastating monetary
contraction – Bernanke added:
Before the creation of the Federal Reserve, Friedman and [Anna]
Schwartz noted, bank panics were typically handled by banks
themselves – for example, through urban consortiums of private
banks called clearinghouses. If a run on one or more banks in a
city began, the clearinghouse might declare a suspension of payments,
meaning that, temporarily, deposits would not be convertible
into cash. Larger, stronger banks would then take the lead,
first, in determining that the banks under attack were in fact
fundamentally solvent, and second, in lending
cash to those banks that needed to meet withdrawals. Though not
an entirely satisfactory solution – the suspension of payments
for several weeks was a significant hardship for the public –
the system of suspension of payments usually prevented local
banking panics from spreading or persisting. Large, solvent
banks had an incentive to participate in curing panics because
they knew that an unchecked panic might ultimately threaten
their own deposits.
It was in large part to improve the management of banking panics
that the Federal Reserve was created in 1913. However, as
Friedman and Schwartz discuss in some detail, in the early 1930s
the Federal Reserve did not serve that function. The problem
within the Fed was largely doctrinal: Fed officials appeared to
subscribe to Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon's infamous "liquidationist"
thesis, that weeding out "weak" banks was a harsh but
necessary prerequisite to the recovery of the banking system.
Moreover, most of the failing banks were small banks (as opposed
to what we would now call money-center banks) and not members of
the Federal Reserve System. Thus the Fed saw no particular need
to try to stem the panics. At the same time, the large banks –
which would have intervened before the founding of the Fed –
felt that protecting their smaller brethren was no longer their
responsibility. Indeed, since the large banks felt confident
that the Fed would protect them if necessary, the weeding out of
small competitors was a positive good, from their point of view.
In short, according to Friedman and Schwartz, because of
institutional changes and misguided doctrines, the banking
panics of the Great Contraction were much more severe and
widespread than would have normally occurred during a downturn.
…
Let me end my talk by abusing slightly my status as an official
representative of the Federal Reserve. I would like to say to
Milton and Anna: Regarding the Great Depression. You're right,
we did it. We're very sorry. But thanks to you, we won't do it
again.
G.
Edward Griffin, in "The Creature from Jekyll Island,"
explains the cause of wars, boom-bust cycles, inflation,
depression, prosperity and more – and calls the Fed the most
blatant scam of all history.
History records that in 1913 President Woodrow Wilson approved the
Federal Reserve Act but later reflected that his actions
"unwittingly ruined my country."
Wilson said that since the U.S. system of
credit
is concentrated in the hands of a few, "we have become …
one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in
the civilized world."
Paul recently announced, as chairman of the House Financial
Services Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology,
a plan to audit the Fed.