|

|
Welcome to Call to Decision
-

Government Study Ties
Chemical Food Additives To
Child Behavior Problems
5-10-7
- Note - This is likely the biggest
non-surprise 'study result' of the last 50 years. The
vile, despicable commercial food industry has been
POISONING hundreds of millions of children and
destroying the lives of many of them for
decades...with total, leering impunity. There has
never been any question that these chemicals and
'additives' approved as 'safe' by the hideously
corrupt Monsanto/Big Pharma/Factory
Farming/AMA-dominated FDA - and the FSA in the UK -
are toxic, life-altering, life-destroying POISONS.
-
- So, now with an 'official' study
finally on the table, what will U.S. food
conglomerates and 'candy' companies and corporations
do to voluntarily to clean up their products? Probably
nothing. We all know what to expect from the FDA: more
corruption, deal-making, lies, deceit, obfuscation
(how about aspartame for one small example) and the
ultimate sacrificing of human lives, especially our
children, to the chemical additive and food
preservative industries. Read these quotes from the
following story carefully:
-
- "The consequences can be very
serious for both children and adults...The reaction in
children can be horrendous in terms of mood swings
with crying, screaming, inability to sleep...There can
also be physical reactions such as difficulty in
breathing on skin rashes. For a young person
there is also a risk of quite angry mood swings."
-
- Now, one would hope it wouldn't take
any more information than that to enable people to
also see the DIRECT CAUSAL LINK between the knowing
poisoning of children's food with toxic additives
and preservatives, and the mega-BILLION dollar
psychotropic childhood drugging industry with its
front line destroyer/killers of Ritalin and its stable
of antidepressant SSRIs which permanently, physically
change the brain and decimate the lives in countless
human beings. Is there collusion between the 'food
protection agencies' (FDA, FSA, etc) and the
pharmaceutical industry? At the very LEAST, there
is a luxurious, astronomically profitable trillion
dollar symbiotic interaction.
-
- The food additive chemical poisoning
of our children (and adults) into aberrant,
dysfunctional, 'anti-social' mental and psychological
behavior which is then 'treated' by the complicit and
seemingly insane psychological/medical industry which
leaps to put put children on their killer medications
to 'correct' what are usually nothing more than toxic
chemical reactions is beyond heinous. The black humor
of poisoned children being diagnosed NOT as
having been poisoned but as suffering from phony
disorders like ADD, ADHD and other 'anti-social' and
learning disability monikers boggles the mind and
should send a surge of outrage through every parent on
the planet.
-
- So, read on and don't say we, and
thousands of others, haven't been trying to warn of
this for the last 20-plus years. Read labels, buy only
organic and NON-GMO, and try to give your children
(and yourselves) a fighting chance for a normal life.
God knows there are dozens of other destroyers of
lives waiting and lurking to greet them as they grow
up. - Jeff Rense, Editor-in-Chief
-
-
- Food Additives Tied To Child
Behavior Problems
-
- The proof food additives ARE as bad
as we feared.
-
- By Sean Poulter
- 5-10-7
-
- Parents have been warned to avoid
artificial additives used in drinks, sweets and
processed foods amid a link to behaviour problems in
children. A study funded by the
government's Food Standards Agency(FSA) is understood
to have drawn a link with temper tantrums and poor
concentration.
- There are also concerns about
allergic reactions such as asthma and rashes.
-
- The findings are potentially
explosive for the entire food industry, which faces
the need to reformulate a vast array of children's
products. Vyvyan Howard, professor of
bio-imaging at Ulster University and an adviser to the
FSA, called on parents and manufacturers to protect
children. He said: "It is biologically
plausible that they could be having an effect. "Parents
can protect their children by avoiding foods
containing the additives. I personally do not feed
these sorts of foods to my 15-month-old
daughter."
-
- He called on manufacturers and
supermarkets to remove the additives on a
precautionary basis. He said: "It is
the right thing to do to remove these additives from
children's foods. They have no nutritional value, so
why put them in?
-
- "There are very tight
restrictions banning these additives from foods
designed for children under the age of one. "But
why stop there? Children's brains and nervous systems
are developing beyond the age of one."
-
- Prof Howard is not a member of the
FSA committee assessing the latest research, however
he did advise on how the study should be conducted. Experts
on the FSA's Committee on Toxicity(CoT) are expected
to say that parents who want to minimise any risk of
an adverse reaction should avoid these additives.
-
- Some leading companies have already
responded to mounting evidence of harm caused by
chemical additives, particularly the vivid colours
used to dress up products.
-
- Smarties has dropped artificial
colours with the result the blue variety has been
axed. Sainsbury's recently announced a ban
on artificial colours and flavours from 120 own label
soft drinks. This follows similar moves by Marks &
Spencer and the Co-op.
-
- The research, carried out by a team
from Southampton University, appears to confirm
earlier studies suggesting additives can cause
reactions, either individually or as a cocktail.
-
- The colours, tested on groups of
three-year-olds and eight-to-nine year olds, were
tartrazine (E102), ponceau 4R (E124), sunset yellow
(E110), carmoisine (E122), quinoline yellow (E104) and
allura red AC (E129).
-
- The team also looked at the effect
of the preservative sodium benzoate (E211), which is
commonly used in soft drinks. Precise
details of the research findings are being kept secret
until they can be peer reviewed and published in a
scientific journal.
-
- However, a source at Southampton
University told the food industry's magazine, The
Grocer, that their results are in line with earlier
findings, published in 2004.
-
- The original research, which took
place on the Isle of Wight, involved giving fruit
drinks to children aged three. In some weeks, these
were laced with additives. Parents reported
changed behaviour when the youngsters were given the
additives.
-
- However, the original findings were
questioned because they relied on anecdotal reports
from parents while the fact the children were so young
made it difficult to measure their behaviour in a
meaningful way. Because of these doubts, a
second tranche of research was commissioned following
advice from an expert committee, which included
Professor Howard.
-
- The Founder of the Hyperactive
Children Support Group, Sally Bunday, said there is
good evidence that artificial additives can have a
harmful effect.
-
- She said: "The consequences can
be very serious for both children and adults who are
sensitive to these artificial colours. "The
reaction in children can be horrendous in terms of
mood swings with crying, screaming, inability to
sleep.
-
- "There can also be physical
reactions such as difficulty in breathing on skin
rashes. For a young person there is also a risk
of quite angry mood swings."
-
- The founder of the organic brand
Organix, Lizzie Vann, has been campaigning for a ban
on all artificial additives from children's food.
-
- "The use of artificial
additives in children's foods means we are conducting
a long-term experiment on our children's health,"
she said.
-
- "If the Government is serious
about improving children's nutrition the ban on
artificial food additives must be a priority."
-
- The Food & Drink Federation,
which speaks for manufacturers, said the colours and
chemicals used by the industry are proven to be safe. "The
use of food additives is strictly regulated under
European law," it said. "They
must be approved as safe by the appropriate European
scientific committee before they can be
used...Consumers' intake of food additives is also
closely monitored.
-
- "A recent European Commission
report on 'Dietary Food Additive Intake' indicated
that consumption of all types of additives was within
the strict safety limits set by the legislation.
Particular attention was given to consumption by
children."
-
- The FSA and Southampton University
refused to comment until the research has been
officially published.
-
- ©2007 Associated Newspapers Ltd
-
- http://www.raidersnewsnetwork.com/full.php?news=5292
|
Disclaimer
Email
This Article

MainPage
http://www.rense.com
This
Site Served by TheHostPros
|
May 12th, 2007
6:52:55 P.M.
RNU NAVIGATION
Search RNU
|
Food
Additives Tied To Child Behavior Problems
Added: May 9th, 2007 7:50 AM
The proof food additives ARE as
bad as we feared
By SEAN POULTER
Parents have been warned to avoid artificial additives
used in drinks, sweets and processed foods amid a link
to behaviour problems in children.
A study funded by the government's Food Standards
Agency(FSA) is understood to have drawn a link with
temper tantrums and poor concentration.
There are also concerns about allergic reactions such as
asthma and rashes.
The findings are potentially explosive for the entire
food industry, which faces the need to reformulate a
vast array of children's products.
Vyvyan Howard, professor of bio-imaging at Ulster
University and an adviser to the FSA, called on parents
and manufacturers to protect children.
He said: "It is biologically plausible that they
could be having an effect.
"Parents can protect their children by avoiding
foods containing the additives. I personally do not feed
these sorts of foods to my 15-month-old daughter."
He called on manufacturers and supermarkets to remove
the additives on a precautionary basis.
He said: "It is the right thing to do to remove
these additives from children's foods. They have no
nutritional value, so why put them in?
"There are very tight restrictions banning these
additives from foods designed for children under the age
of one.
"But why stop there? Children's brains and nervous
systems are developing beyond the age of one."
Prof Howard is not a member of the FSA committee
assessing the latest research, however he did advise on
how the study should be conducted.
Experts on the FSA's Committee on Toxicity(CoT) are
expected to say that parents who want to minimise any
risk of an adverse reaction should avoid these
additives.
Some leading companies have already responded to
mounting evidence of harm caused by chemical additives,
particularly the vivid colours used to dress up
products.
Smarties has dropped artificial colours with the result
the blue variety has been axed.
Sainsbury's recently announced a ban on artificial
colours and flavours from 120 own label soft drinks.
This follows similar moves by Marks & Spencer and
the Co-op.
The research, carried out by a team from Southampton
University, appears to confirm earlier studies
suggesting additives can cause reactions, either
individually or as a cocktail.
The colours, tested on groups of three-year-olds and
eight-to-nine year olds, were tartrazine (E102), ponceau
4R (E124), sunset yellow (E110), carmoisine (E122),
quinoline yellow (E104) and allura red AC (E129).
The team also looked at the effect of the preservative
sodium benzoate (E211), which is commonly used in soft
drinks.
Precise details of the research findings are being kept
secret until they can be peer reviewed and published in
a scientific journal.
However, a source at Southampton University told the
food industry's magazine, The Grocer, that their results
are in line with earlier findings, published in 2004.
The original research, which took place on the Isle of
Wight, involved giving fruit drinks to children aged
three. In some weeks, these were laced with additives.
Parents reported changed behaviour when the youngsters
were given the additives.
However, the original findings were questioned because
they relied on anecdotal reports from parents while the
fact the children were so young made it difficult to
measure their behaviour in a meaningful way.
Because of these doubts, a second tranche of research
was commissioned following advice from an expert
committee, which included Professor Howard.
The Founder of the Hyperactive Children Support Group,
Sally Bunday, said there is good evidence that
artificial additives can have a harmful effect.
She said: "The consequences can be very serious for
both children and adults who are sensitive to these
artificial colours.
"The reaction in children can be horrendous in
terms of mood swings with crying, screaming, inability
to sleep. There can also be physical reactions such as
difficulty in breathing on skin rashes.
"For a young person there is also a risk of quite
angry mood swings."
The founder of the organic brand Organix, Lizzie Vann,
has been campaigning for a ban on all artificial
additives from children's food.
"The use of artificial additives in children’s
foods means we are conducting a long-term experiment on
our children’s health," she said.
"If the Government is serious about improving
children’s nutrition the ban on artificial food
additives must be a priority."
The Food & Drink Federation, which speaks for
manufacturers, said the colours and chemicals used by
the industry are proven to be safe.
"The use of food additives is strictly regulated
under European law," it said.
"They must be approved as safe by the appropriate
European scientific committee before they can be
used...Consumers' intake of food additives is also
closely monitored.
"A recent European Commission report on 'Dietary
Food Additive Intake' indicated that consumption of all
types of additives was within the strict safety limits
set by the legislation. Particular attention was given
to consumption by children."
The FSA and Southampton University refused to comment
until the research has been officially published.
©2007 Associated Newspapers Ltd
Print
this story
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site
contains copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our
efforts to advance understanding of environmental,
political, human rights, economic, democracy,
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for
research and educational purposes. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site
for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|
> Now Available

"I've got to tell you, they'll put chills down your
spine!"
Barbara Simpson
Coast to Coast
>> More News
>> More Articles
|
|