1.
Mass.
Senate
spits
on
parents
-
unanimously
approves
huge
funding
increases
for
homosexual
programs
in
schools.
Even
"good"
senators
caved
in.
Leadership
used
sleazy
maneuver
to
avoid
debate.
Homosexual
lobby
triumphs.
Yesterday
the
Massachusetts
Senate
unanimously
caved
in
to
the
homosexual
lobby.
Using
a
particularly
sleazy
maneuver
they
increased
the
funding
for
homosexual
programs
in
the
schools
by
$300,000
--
to
$850,000
in
the
2009
budget.
This
money
will
go
(either
directly
or
indirectly)
to
the
hideous
Massachusetts
Commission
on
Gay
Lesbian
Bisexual
and
Transgender
Youth,
which
(among
other
things)
recently
organized
the
disgusting
Youth
Pride
Day
on
the
Boston
Common.
They
had
also
announced
that
"parents
are
the
problem"
because
they
teach
traditional
values.
Earlier
this
month
the
full
Mass.
House
of
Representatives
had
voted
overwhelmingly
(including
many
"pro-family
reps)
to
increase
this
funding
from
$500,000
to
$750,000.
But
then
after
getting
a
flood
of
phone
calls
from
angry
parents
and
citizens,
the
Senate
committee
cut
it
down
to
$550,000.
But
the
homosexual
lobby
wasn't
giving
up.
As
we
reported
last
week
Sen.
Dianne
Wilkerson
(D-Boston)
who
has
become
a
huge
pro-homosexual
ally
since
they
helped
her
in
her
recent
election
fight,
filed
two
amendments
to
raise
it
up
to
$850,000
(which
was
MORE
than
the
homosexual
lobby
has
asked
for):
Amendment
#466:
Increase
budget
item
7010-0005
from
$200,000
to
$300,000
Amendment
#654:
Increase
budget
item
4590-0250
from
$350,000
to
$550,000
Fighting
back
We
got
right
to
work.
We
got
a
as
many
people
as
possible
to
call
and
email
Sen.
Wilkerson,
and
also
the
entire
40-person
Senate.
It
apparently
got
so
intense
that
Wilkerson
disconnected
her
email
for
a
period
of
time.
We
also
sent
each
Senate
office
the
descriptions
of
the
bigoted,
anti-Catholic
/
anti-Christian
pamphlets
given
out
to
kids,
and
the
links
to
the
pamphlets.
Several
Senators'
staffers
also
get
these
regular
emails,
so
they
know
what
we're
talking
about.
But
the
leadership
of
the
Senate
made
the
decision
to
give
the
homosexual
activists
everything
they
asked
for
and
the
members
unanimously
approved.
And
the
homosexual
lobby,
in
tandem,
used
their
usual
tactic
of
disingenuously
describing
these
destructive
and
offensive
programs
as
"violence
and
suicide
prevention".
Of
course,
we've
exposed
and
disproved
that
lie
over
and
over
to
these
politicians.
But
it
plays
on
their
basic
cowardice
and
their
fear
of
standing
up
against
this
vicious
lobby.
So
they
all
caved
in
and
supported
it,
rather
than
doing
the
right
thing.
And
Senate
President
Therese
Murray,
like
her
counterpart
in
the
House,
Sal
DiMasi,
sold
you're
your
children
and
carried
the
water
for
this
bizarre
special-interest
group.
Last
night
homosexual
lobby
MassEquality
sent
out
the
following
email
to
their
supporters,
bragging
about
their
victory:
From
MassEquality:
Today
was
another
great
day
for
equality
in
the
Commonwealth!
The
Massachusetts
Senate
has
just
approved
several
budget
amendments
to
increase
funding
for
programs
supporting
LGBT
youth,
seniors
.
.
.
In
all
cases,
these
amendments
meet
or
exceed
the
funding
MassEquality
helped
secure
for
these
programs
in
the
House
budget.
·
Department
of
Public
Health
funding
for
school
health
and
community-based
services
for
LGBT
youth
was
increased
by
$200,000
to
$550,000,
which
is
$100,000
more
than
what
was
allocated
in
the
House.
·
Department
of
Education
funding
for
school
safety
and
suicide
prevention
programs
for
LGBT
youth
was
increased
by
$100,000
to
$300,000,
matching
the
same
level
allocated
in
the
House.
.
.
It's
a
strong
testament
to
the
power
that
comes
in
working
together,
and
what
we
can
achieve
when
we
put
all
of
our
voices
together.
Once
again,
you
came
through,
with
over
500
members
contacting
their
legislators
in
just
the
past
two
weeks
alone.
This
is
what
can
happen
when
you
make
your
voice
heard.
We
also
owe
great
thanks
to
our
allies
in
the
Senate,
including
Senate
President
Therese
Murray,
Senator
Ed
Augustus
and
in
particular
Senator
Dianne
Wilkerson,
who
took
the
lead
on
many
of
our
budget
priorities
and
succeeded
in
delivering
increased
funding
to
all
of
these
critical
programs.
We'll
be
in
touch
with
more
information
as
the
budget
makes
its
way
through
conference
and
to
the
Governor's
desk.
But
in
the
meantime,
thank
you,
as
always,
for
all
you
do.
Marc
Solomon
Campaign
Director
Here's
what
actually
happened.
The
Senate
Ways
and
Means
Committee
decided
on
their
version
of
the
budget
last
Wednesday.
Over
the
next
two
days,
individual
senators
filed
897
amendments,
including
#466
and
#654
by
Wilkerson.
On
Wednesday
and
Thursday
of
this
week
the
full
Senate
met
to
"vote"
on
all
of
them.
During
these
sessions
the
senate
went
through
the
list
of
amendments
in
numerical
order
very
quickly,
reading
the
title
and
taking
a
"voice
vote."
In
fact,
there
was
no
voice
votes
taken.
None
of
the
members
actually
said
"yea"
or
"nay".
The
president
would
call
for
a
vote
and
then
immediately
announce
that
it
passed
or
failed.
(It
was
very
strange
and
actually
quite
offensive
to
see.
We
have
some
video
of
this
we'll
post
in
our
next
email.)
Through
that
method,
most
of
the
amendments
took
only
seconds
to
deal
with.
A
few
amendments
were
announced
to
have
been
withdrawn
by
the
sponsor.
Occasionally
a
member
raised
his
hand
to
make
a
comment
or
ask
a
question
about
the
amendment
at
hand.
And
a
few
times
someone
actually
spoke
up
and
called
for
a
roll
call
vote
on
an
amendment.
But
that
was
very
rare.
But
as
they
went
through
the
list,
some
of
the
amendments
--
including
#466
and
#654
-
were
simply
skipped.
(These
seem
to
be
controversial
amendments
that
the
leadership
wanted
to
push
through
in
a
way
comfortable
for
the
senators,
and
without
having
to
actually
read
the
titles
publicly.)
Then
at
the
very
end
of
the
day
the
Senate
President
lumped
those
skipped
amendments
into
two
"bundles"
-
a
"yes"
bundle
and
a
"no"
bundle.
Amendments
#466
and
#654
were
in
the
"yes"
bundle.
,
A
quick
phony
"voice
vote"
was
taken.
And
that
was
that.
Nobody
raised
any
objection
nor
made
any
comment
about
those
amendments
being
in
the
bundle
and
not
dealt
with
normally.
They
just
followed
the
leadership's
direction.
Then
the
senators
voted
on
the
entire
amended
budget,
passed
it
unanimously,
congratulated
themselves,
and
went
home.
Everyone
knew
what
was
going
on
A
senate
insider
later
told
us
that
every
senator
knew
full
well
what
was
in
each
amendment,
and
what
was
in
the
"bundles."
According
to
the
rules,
we
were
told,
any
senator
could
have
asked
for
an
amendment
to
be
taken
out
of
the
bundle
and
dealt
with
separately.
But
they
didn't
want
to.
For
the
"pro-family"
senators
it
was
easier
to
just
sit
there
and
not
risk
getting
into
a
confrontation
with
their
colleagues
or
with
the
gay
lobby.
The
next
step
is
that
the
House
and
Senate
versions
go
|