NEO
AMERICAN VALUES
By
Niki Raapana
February
11, 2007
NewsWithViews.com
As
if we are all kindergarteners, Americans are being taught to honor
and obey new values. According to our wise leaders, we now have a
new sense of purpose, a new way of thinking, and a new duty to
volunteer in our communities. We all must serve goals larger than
self.
Our
new sense of purpose is to make war in order to bring democracy to
uncivilized nations. Our new way of thinking is to think
collectively rather than individually. Our new duty is to volunteer
for the collective, which is so important it must be made mandatory.
Our
old sense of purpose was to protect the Republic against monarchists
and imperialists, to ensure the rights of each individual citizen
were not violated by agents or officials in power. Our old way of
thinking was that U.S. law was designed to protect individuals from
despots, tyrants and other unsavory types, like liars, thieves and
murderers. Our old-fashioned duty to our community was not only
voluntary, but forced volunteerism was very illegal.
There
is a "new vision for the future," and obviously, average
Americans cannot be told the exact nature of this vision or the
required changes to their system. The vision, in its entirety is
only discussed in upper academia and behind closed office doors.
When the national press does write about it for the vulgar masses,
the theory and the ideas are never scrutinized as a genuinely free
press would be free to do. Not even modern American political
scientists are told the exact nature of the evolution of America.
It's missing from every school textbook.
What
Americans are not taught is the purpose and goals the new
un-American values serve. Our free and enlightened citizens are
learning to serve without a clue what it is they serve. Why don't
our citizens know anything about the ultimate goal of the New
American ideals? Because if they knew what the real terms are they
would overwhelmingly reject all of it.
They
are expected to uphold the new requirements for the new citizenship,
but they are not to be told what the new American values are based
upon. It's called rule by "consensus."
Americans
would never agree to adopt a new communitarian global system of law.
That's why the real goal is so obscure, and why the only research
about it is left to people like me.
In
many ways, it's what's not included in our lessons that indicates
the true motives of our teachers. A lie by omission is still a lie,
and probably more effective than any other form.
In
Government by the People, the Twentieth Edition published by Pearson
in 2004 and edited by a group of experts on American government,
there is not one mention of the "new" goal. The Democratic
Leadership Council is barely mentioned in Part II on p. 173 as a
"moderate" Democratic faction "dominated by an array
of southern governors and senators." Defining the Third Way is
the stated purpose of the New Democrats, but again, the Third Way is
excluded entirely from this school book. The power of the New
Democrats and their "new" communitarian agenda (which
elected Clinton and was carried on without hesitation by the Bush
Presidency, using the same advisors) is simply not included anywhere
in the entire book. Interestingly, Bush's theocratic advisor and
speechwriter, Robert Putnam and his communitarian book, Bowling
Alone, are referred to on pages 11, 12, 86, 197-98.
This
factual American textbook does explain on p. 6 that, "The word
'democracy' is nowhere to be found in the Declaration of
Independence or the U.S. Constitution, nor was it a term used by the
founders of the Republic. It is both a very old term and a modern
one. It was used at the time of the founding of this nation to refer
to various undesirables: mobs, lack of standards, and a system that
encourages leaders to gain power by appealing to the emotions and
prejudices of the rabble." They tell us our framers preferred
the term republic to avoid confusion with the idea of direct
democracy. Then our good teachers explain that, "Today, as in
this book, the terms republic and democracy are used
interchangeably."
This
American government textbook cannot avoid the truth about the roles
Personal Liberty and Respect for the Individual play in the American
system. But once we turn the page we learn communitarian
modifications of the American system, without being told that's what
it is. On page 8 we are introduced to the Hegelian conflict ideology
(which is the basis for communitaranism): "Democratic Values in
Conflict- The basic values of democracy do not always co-exist
happily. Individualism may conflict with the collective welfare or
the public good. Self-determination may conflict with equal
opportunity." Then the true goal of communitarian thinking is
introduced: "Much of our political combat revolves around how
to strike a balance among democratic values." Here our learned
teachers made the conscious choice to refrain from explaining or
exploring where the terms "strike a balance" originated.
Another
clue that we are being purposefully misled is also on page 8:
"Expansion of democracy in the United States and elsewhere was
in many ways a twentieth-century idea." No mention is made of
the many declarations of independence made in colonies around the
world in the fifty years following the American Revolution. No
mention of how many national constitutions were written and passed
based entirely on the American principles for self-governance. And,
expansion of "democracy" was not a twentieth century idea,
it was a nineteenth century global political and economic platform
explained in the Communist Manifesto. On page 10 our lovely
communitarian teachers explain, "A relatively prosperous nation
with an equitable distribution of wealth, provides the best context
for democracy."
This
is the part where Americans just cannot grasp the truth about the
changes to the laws that govern their nation and take away their
rights to property and privacy. An "equitable distribution of
wealth" is a heavily loaded phrase that opens up the whole
communitarian can-of-worms. Good thing our teachers don't bother to
explain what it really means (or why it's the goal of every U.N.
programme for development). They simply state: "Some measure of
private ownership of property and a relatively favorable role for
the market economy are also related to the creation and maintenance
of democratic institutions. Democracies can range from heavily
regulated economies with public ownership of many enterprises, such
as Sweden, to those in which there is little government regulation
of the marketplace."
The
actual term communitarian and the political system it creates, if
you believe this book, does not exist. The term, the philosophy, the
international integration requirements and the abundance of American
communitarian trade agreements, plans, laws and programs do not
exist. There is nothing about U.N. Local Agenda 21 or sustainable
development in this book.
The
truth about the new American system is excluded. Our American
students will never know anything of value or how to defend their
republic from corporate thieves. The truth, which can easily be
verified in official documents and websites, is just plain missing.
The most powerful and lasting changes to the American system cannot
be revealed to our reformed public,. We're just expected to comply
with the new requirements and regulations. To suggest there is an
ongoing plot to destroy our republic and the unity of our nation is
to defy legions of professors and politicians who support the plot.
Where are the Americans of today brave enough to take on the new
empire's entire academic and political establishment?
It's
been several years since we found President George Washington's
Farewell Address to the Nation. Published upon his retirement from
Public Office in 1796, he spells it out, in no uncertain terms, the
exact way America could be destroyed. He offers his wisdom to our
"solemn contemplation," and recommends we review it
frequently. His precise and clear sentiments are based on what he
calls, "of no inconsiderable observation."
"That
it is easy to foresee, that from different causes & from
different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices
employed, to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth; as
this is the point in your political fortress against which the
batteries of internal & external enemies will be most constantly
and actively (though often covertly and insidiously) directed, it is
of infinite moment, that you should properly estimate the immense
value of your national Union to your collective and individual
happiness;
" ( "The Declaration of Independence and
Other Great Documents of American History" p.50, Dover Thrift
Edition .)
The
Communitarian liars are our newest "batteries of internal and
external enemies." Isn't it just too funny that the
Communitarian Network is at George Washington University in DC?
When
we read Washington's Address the first time, we were still deeply
engrossed in our COMPASS database research. All of the new laws
allowing the federal government's new data-gathering operations were
"innovative strategies of enforcement." The term
innovative was used throughout Seattle's Local Agenda 21 Plans, and
we had come to recognize it to mean a way around constitutional
restrictions forbidding government intrusions. After we read
Washington's line, "resist with care the spirit of innovation
upon its principles, however specious the pretexts," these
words became the basis for the ACL's Mission Statement.
We
are absolutely certain U.S. government officials have no authority
what-so-ever to change or "balance" U.S. Constitutional
Law. We didn't fabricate the terms for sedition.
"The
basis of our political system is the right of the people to make and
alter their Constitutions of Government. But the Constitution which
at any time exists, 'till changed by an explicit and authentic act
of the whole People, is sacredly obligatory upon all."( G.W.)
Part
of my communitarian research is devoted to understanding why
Americans have not been informed of it's existence and why they
continue to label us conspiracy theorists. To my knowledge,
President Washington wasn't labeled a conspiracy theorist for
insisting that the basis of our system is our Constitution and NOT
"democratic ideals." But today, like us, he probably would
be. He far too openly said internal espionage and covert methods
would be used by the American people's enemies. He quite frankly
told us how many artifices would be employed to" weaken in our
minds the conviction" of our Unity of Government.
Unlike
modern politicians who speak to us only from the dialectic,
Washington spoke freely about the real issues facing our nation in
1796. He addressed highly critical public topics like religion,
sedition, party politics, love of power, foreign entanglements, and
public credit. Unlike modern Americans who blindly trust their
political leaders, Washington called the union between the states a
political fortress which would be under continual attack from many
groups coming from many directions. According to The Father of Our
Country, what constitutes us as one people is our Unity of
Government, "a main Pillar in the Edifice of your real
independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace
abroad, of your safety, of your prosperity; of that very Liberty
which you so highly prize."
The
awesome new Communitarian ideology has a fatal tendency, just ask
George:
"All
obstructions to the execution of the Laws, all combinations and
Associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real
design to direct, controul, counteract, or awe the regular
deliberation and action of the Constituted authorities are
destructive of this fundamental principle and of fatal tendency.
They serve to Organize faction, to give it an artificial and
extraordinary force- to put in the place of the delegated will of
the Nation, the will of a party, often a small but artful and
enterprising minority of the Community, and according to the
alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public
Administration the Mirror of the ill concerted and incongruous
projects of faction, rather than the Organ of consistent and
wholesome plans digested by common councils and modified by mutual
interests. However combinations or Associations of the above
description may now & then answer popular ends, they are likely,
in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which
cunning, ambitious and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert
the Power of the People, & to usurp for themselves the reigns of
government; destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted
them to unjust dominion." (ibid, pp 53)
Beware
the word "new" when it's used to define someone's
politics. This is a key term used by communitarian unconstitutional
planners. The framers for the New America are framing our new
regional system the same way the American Founding Fathers created
our national system in 1787, in secret. Cunning, ambitious lawmakers
just disregard the fact that the U.S. Constitution adopted by the 13
states explicitly requires an open, public discourse followed by a
national vote regarding any attempt to "strike a balance"
to the national system of law.
If
there were only one prominent American who has the courage and the
principles to declare war on the communitarians. But the comms are
powerful and extremely well-funded (and have a bad reputation for
assassinating opponents). Our new system is based in lies; it values
most its liars, it honors them with wealth, titles and positions.
Unprincipled men will not be subjected to the same restrictions
placed upon all the other individuals in the democracy. Who will
tell the American People that the inheritors of the great American
experiment in self-government failed to maintain it? We've lost it
all, most miserably, and with almost zero resistance. Our free and
united People morphed with their eyes closed into becoming the
greatest slaves and dupes in the history of the world. Maybe it's
fitting that our People will never learn of their fate; what values
can we possibly possess when a lie becomes our truth?
© 2007 Niki Raapana-
All Rights Reserved
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs
alerts, not for sale
Niki
Raapana is the co-founder of the Anti-Communitarian League (ACL), an
online research center for studying outside the box.
Niki
is also the recent author of the non-fiction biography, 2020. Unlike
the ACL website (which is a massive endeavor) 2020 introduces the
global community government in 100-pages using laymen's terms for
average readers. Price: $20.00, includes S&H. Send check or
money order to: Nordica Friedrich-2020, P.O. Box 231941, Anchorage,
Alaska, 99523 or order online using PayPal at the ACL: http://nord.twu.net/acl
http://www.newswithviews.com/Raapana/niki12.htm
E-Mail: nikiraapana@gmail.com
"The most dangerous man, to any government, is
the man who is able to think things out for himself, without
regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost
inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives
under is dishonest, insane and intolerable, and so, if he is
romantic, he tries to change it. And even if he is not romantic
personally, he is very apt to spread discontent among those who
are." - H.L. Mencken, Smart Set magazine, December 1919.
Who will rise up for me against the evildoers? Or who will stand
up for me against the workers of iniquity? (Psalm 94:16)
And I [i.e., the LORD God Almighty] sought for a man among
them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before
me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found
none. (Ezekiel 22:30)
No one is
obligated or bound to obey usurped power and those who do
will be judged by God for rebellion. Obedience to tyrants is
rebellion to God.
"The Bible is
the Rock on which this Republic rests."
--Andrew Jackson
The Constitution of the USA
Article 4 Section 4
Republican form of government guaranteed.
Each State to be protected. The United States shall
guarantee to every state in this union, a republican form of
government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and
on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the
legislature cannot be convened), against domestic violence.
I sought for the greatness and the genius of
America in her ample rivers-it was not there; in her fertile
fields and boundless prairies, and it was not there; in her rich
mines and her vast world commerce, and it was not there. Not
until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits
ablaze with righteousness did I meet the secret of her genius
and power. America is great because she is good, and if America
ever ceases to be good-America will cease to be great. -Alexis
de Tocqueville
American
Christian Constitutional Republic
The Flag of
the Confederate States of America
This flag is flown because the
south was right. The war was NOT fought over slavery!!
The Confederate Constitution made slavery illegal. The
slaves were to be freed. It was fought over States rights.
http://www.daveblackonline.com/confederate_flags.htm
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/rebel_flag.html
The
most important web sites you will ever arrive at! www.pastorbutch.com
www.prisonplanet.tv
Live Search: Better results, fast Try
it now!