![]() |
|||
|
|
Welcome to Call to Decision REASONS TO JUST SAY NO TO VACCINES Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO July 9, 2008 NewsWithViews.com
Vaccinating
children has become sacrosanct in our culture. Doctors and
government officials insist that vaccines are safe, and
parents are pressured into compliance. In fact, parents have
been reported to social services by doctors who consider not
vaccinating to be a form of medical neglect or child abuse.
Legislators across the country are attempting to pass laws in
which parents will have no rights to refuse what is injected
into their children.
The
inconsistency of rules involving the care of children is
striking. Mothers are in complete control of their child’s
health while in the womb. They make choices against eating
tuna, taking medications, smoking cigarettes and avoiding
alcohol. Mothers may choose to even terminate the pregnancy.
But the moment the baby arrives, control over their
child’s body is forcibly surrendered to healthcare
providers and the government. The leg is jabbed with shots,
eyes are gooped with antibiotic ointment and the heel is
poked to get a drop of DNA-containing blood. With the
passage of the Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act of 2007,
signed into law April 24, 2008, the blood will be collected
and warehoused for scientific research.[1]
Parents have little or no say in any of these events. (see
my previous article, “Who
Owns Your Child?”)
Vaccination
is promoted by an industry that capitalizes on fear and the
perceived necessity of the procedure has become multi-generationally
entrenched. We have been programmed by the medical community
and the media to believe that everyone – children and
adults -- will become sick, and likely die, unless they are
vaccinated. This explains why not vaccinating can be
unfathomable to new parents who are unreasonably terrified
of what were considered normal childhood illnesses only a
few decades ago. The majority adults over 50 years of age
remember having measles and the chickenpox. Both were mostly
mild diseases, lasting seven to fourteen days, and leaving
behind lifetime immunity.
And even
though chickenpox is rarely fatal, most parents opt to
vaccinate. Merck & Co. estimated that as of December 31,
2007, 80 to 85 percent of all four to six-year-olds had
received two doses of Varivax®, at one year and a booster
before school.[2]
With little attention on the problems with the chickenpox
vaccine cited in the media, most don’t realize that it can
cause harm. Research shows that nearly 1 in 5,000 children
who receive the chickenpox inoculation develop shingles
within ten years of being vaccinated. Shingles, an intensely
painful, blistering rash, is most commonly seen in the
elderly or the chronically ill. It was rarely, if ever, seen
in healthy children before the introduction of this vaccine.
Other serious side effects, such as seizures, pneumonia, and
anaphylaxis (a severe allergic reaction), have been reported
as a result of Varivax. Before it became available, about 50
children died every year from rare or unusual complications
of the chickenpox. Put in perspective, 53 children died in
drowning accidents in the [U.S.] state of Georgia in 1999.
Vaccination
has been cited as one of the ten greatest public health
achievements of the 20th century. However, it doesn’t
require an advanced degree in science to grasp that the
public health accolades, celebrating high vaccination rates
and low infection rates, have lead to serious health
consequences across the globe. Vaccine ingredients seem to
be playing a substantial role.
Problems
With Vaccine
Ingredients
Gelatin,
one of many ingredients in vaccines, is known to cause
allergies and asthma. Allergies are now the most frequently
reported chronic condition in children, limiting activities
in four out of 10 children. Asthma, the second most common
chronic childhood disease, affects more than one child in
20. The combined healthcare costs of asthma and allergies
have soared to more than $25 billion/year.[3]
Vaccines that contain gelatin include chickenpox, MMR,
Boostrix (teen pertussis booster), Tripedia (DTaP) and the
adult shingles vaccine, Zostrix. Vaccine gelatin may be
contributing substantially to the skyrocketing incidence of,
and expenditures on, asthma and allergies.
Another
vaccine additive, formaldehyde, can interrupt the normal
function of the immune system. A colorless, pungent-smelling
gas, formaldehyde can cause watery eyes, burning sensations
in the eyes and throat, nausea, difficulty in breathing and
asthma attacks when exposed to amounts as small as 0.1 parts
per million. It is listed as a hazardous chemical on eight
federal regulatory lists and considered to be one of the ten
worst compounds on the ecosystem and health. Between 10 and
20 percent of general population has a reaction coming in
contact with formaldehyde. Topical exposure can cause a mild
reaction, such as dry skin and redness. The California
Indoor Air Quality Fact Sheet states there is no known
threshold level below which cancer risk does not exist.[4]
The World Health Association (WHO) recommends that an
exposure should not exceed 0.05 ppm or 0.05 mg/kg. So, for
12 pound baby (about 5kg), the maximum exposure should be
below 0.25 mg. But with the current schedule, children
receive more than ten times that amount, more than 3.5 mg,
if they receive every mandated vaccine. Vaccines that
contain formaldehyde include DTaP, polio, influenza,
hepatitis A and hepatitis B.
Thankfully,
mercury (in the form of thimerosal) has been removed from
most vaccines. However, measurable amounts are still found
in multi-vial flu shots, tetanus boosters, Energix-B
(hepatitis B vaccine), Menomune (college meningitis
vaccine), TriHiBit and Tripedia (both DTaP vaccines), and
Twinrix (a combination hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccine).
Trace amounts remain in many more. Countless children have
developed autism and there is strong evidence that their
brains were injured by the preservative thimerosal.
Follow
the Money
Positioned
as a loss leader, vaccines appear to be the economic drivers
of both the medical and the pharmaceutical industry. A loss
leader is a business technique in which a less-expensive
product is sold or given away for the sake of offering
another product at a greater profit. This common practice is
utilized to introduce new customers to a product, to build a
new customer base and/or to secure future recurring revenue.
Using a loss leader is more than just a nifty business trick
- it can be a very successful economic strategy when
executed properly. The classic example of a loss leader is
the sale of razor blades. Companies like Gillette
essentially give their razor units away for free, knowing
that customers will buy their replacement blades, where the
company makes all of its profit, for as long as they use the
razor.
Vaccines
play a similar role for the drug companies. The cost of a
vaccine is relatively inexpensive compared to the billions
of dollars spent on medical interventions, medications—and
even more vaccines—dispensed as a result of a vaccination
side effect.
Consider
this example: the potential consequences of an inoculation
with one of the two newly approved vaccines to prevent a
rotavirus diarrheal infection, RotaTeq® and Rotarix®.
Side
effects listed on the package insert for RotaTeq include
diarrhea, vomiting, irritability, fever, wheezing and
coughing. RotaTeq has also been associated with bloody
stools, a warning sign of a serious complication called an
intussusception. Triggered by the vaccine, intussusception
is an event where a portion of the bowel slides into the
next, much like the pieces of a telescope, causing an
obstruction. Swelling, inflammation, and decreased blood
flow to the fragile lining of the bowel cause the intestine
to die. Between February 3, 2006, when RotaTeq was licensed,
and January 31, 2007, twenty-eight cases of intussusception
were reported in infants who received RotaTeq in the U.S.
Sixteen of the 28 infants required hospitalization and
surgery on their intestine.
In
February, 2008, the FDA issued a warning that there was a
"statistically signficant increase in pneumonia-related
deaths and seizures" associated with the other vaccine
for rotavirus infection.[5] To reduce the risk of pneumonia, doctors
promote the pneumococcal vaccine, Prevnar®. A side effect
of Prevnar, as listed in the package insert, is ear
infections, increasing the use of antibiotics. The many
rounds of antibiotics required to treat recurring ear
infections can cause serious bowel problems, leading to
blood tests and evaluations by the pediatric
gastroenterologist. The cause of all these additional
problems is rarely indentified as a side effect of a
vaccination.
All of
this can result from a Rotarix or a RotaTeq shot, given to
avoid a common infection that most children contract, and
recover from uneventfully, by the time they are three years
of age.
Another example is the hepatitis B vaccine, given at birth, can cause diarrhea, vomiting, and dyspepsia (a condition associated with gnawing or burning stomach pain and persistent vomiting). Tiny children receive x-rays, undergo procedures such as endoscopy, and are given adult medications such as Prilosec® or Nexium® to resolve their discomfort. Unfortunately, since the dyspepsia is not recognized as a vaccine side effect, additional dosages of the hepatitis B vaccine are administered, often compounding the problem.
Vaccines
are the bedrock of expanded illnesses, skyrocketing medical
costs and exponential drug sales. But it is more than
individual vaccines that are cause for concern. The sheer
number of vaccines children now receive between birth and
six years of age is staggering and include: Diphtheria (a
rare throat infection), pertussis, and tetanus (the DTaP
shot); Haemophilus influenza type b (the Hib vaccine);
measles, mumps, and rubella (the MMR shot); pneumococcus
(the Prevnar vaccine); polio (three strains); rotavirus
(five strains); and individual vaccines for hepatitis A,
hepatitis B, chickenpox, and meningitis. Flu shots (three
strains) are now given annually, beginning at six months of
age. That adds up to 113 vaccine antigens by kindergarten
given in about 33 shots.
Parents
are becoming wary of the many needles being jabbed into
their precious babies at the tender age of two, four and six
months. In response, the drug companies are combining
several vaccines into a single injection. Comvax (hepatitis
B and HiB), ProQuad (MMR and chickenpox), Pediarix (DTaP,
polio and hepatitis B) and two newly approved vaccines,
Kinrix (DTaP and polio) and Pentacel (DTaP, polio and HiB)
have been developed. Parents are deceived into believing
that the combination shots are fewer vaccines; they are not:
The number of jabs is reduced, but the number of antigen
doses remains the same.
A significant problem with the combo shots is that, in the event of an
adverse reaction, there is no way to determine which
component caused the problem. This eliminates the ability to
refuse additional doses of a particular vaccine. The ability
to make a claim with the Vaccine Injury Compensation program
is likewise negated.
For
adults who believe the days of deciding about vaccines are
over because their children are now teenagers, think again:
Teenagers are the new target market for the vaccine
industry. Boosters are being recommended for vaccines given
before five years of age and the new teen vaccines, Gardasil
(for cervical cancer) and Menactra (for college-type
meningitis), are being heavily marketed by doctors and the
media. The additional vaccines add substantially to the
total number of vaccine antigen. If little girls receive all
doses of all recommended vaccines, they will have received
156 vaccine antigens and about 45 shots by middle school.
Boys, not yet approved for Gardasil, receive slightly fewer:
only 144 vaccine antigens and about 42 shots.
Many
more vaccines in the pipeline will put teens and adults in
the industry crosshairs. In 2007, adult-teen vaccine sales
overtook pediatric sales, the first time ever, accounting
for 50.6% of all revenues. This development has been
attributed to robust sales of influenza vaccines and the
success of Merck’s advertising to promote Gardasil for the
HPV virus. Gardasil alone posted $1.5 billion in sales in
2007.[6]
And yes,
it’s about the money. In addition to driving revenues as a
loss leader, the newer vaccines are driving revenues through
direct sales of expensive vaccines. According to Genetic
Engineering & Biotechnology News,[7]
Vaccines
are promoted as a way to boost the immune system. It only
stands to reason that injecting multiple doses of pathogens
and measureable amounts of chemicals taxes the immune system
instead of enhancing it. I’ve observed in families who
have more than one child and have chosen to vaccinate the
first, but not subsequent children, the younger siblings
seem to come down with fewer infections and are much
healthier overall. I don’t believe that’s a coincidence.
Preventive
measures aimed at enhancing health can be incorporated into
simple, lifestyle changes. Here are a few helpful
suggestions:
Persons
who investigate both sides of this issue rarely continue
vaccinating. That speaks volumes. If you do decide to “Say
No to Vaccines,” you’re not alone. Thousands of parents
who have experienced first-hand the consequences of
vaccination, including autism, are not looking for
“something to blame.” They are begging other parents to
learn about the risks before they proceed. Learn to trust
your intuitive sense and investigate the full spectrum of
the vaccination issue. You’ll be glad you did.
Footnotes:
1,
Bush
Signs Bill To Take All Newborns' DNA. Critical Analysis.
2, Conference Call 4Q 2007. Merck & Co 3, Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America 4, Formaldehyde in the home. Indoor Air Quality Guideline 5, FDA Executive summary pharmacovigilance review. March 14, 2008 6, “Adults Now Drive Growth of Vaccine Market,” Bruce Carlson. June 1, 2008 7, Ibid. Bruce Carlson
© 2008 - Sherri Tenpenny -
All Rights Reserve
|
|