|

|
Welcome to Call to Decision
Subject: Where are the girls?
The assinine conclusion of The Economist in the face of the evidence.
How blind the sinner is to the plain and simple truth. MBray
*Feminism's "Gendercide"*
By Joseph Meaney
Wondrous news! The mainstream media and even the United Nations have
"discovered" the 30 year old crisis of "missing
girls." /The Economist/ (the recent edition entitled, "Gendercide")
and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) came out with the
"news" that over 100 million girls and women that should be
alive are not.
The culprits are parents who want to have sons only and use sonograms
to identify the sex of their child in the womb. The end result is
millions of sex-selection abortions of unwanted girls every year.
Pro-lifers have denounced this "slaughter of Eve" in the
strongest terms for some time now. It is undoubtedly the greatest
campaign of deadly discrimination against women in history.
Incredibly, with few exceptions, the problem of sex-selection abortion
is steadily worsening in Asia and around the world!
Shockingly, /The Economist's/ recommended solution is more feminism:
more propaganda from the same folks who brought you abortion, but this
time directed toward somehow improving the public image of women and
daughters. Basically, they are saying that a big PR blitz is needed to
highlight the positive contributions of women to society.
Of course, any society that does not value female children or women in
general, as much as men, is in serious need of a change of heart on
the subject. Can anyone take seriously, however, the proposition that
those who trumpet abortion as a paramount right of women are the best
ones to lead us in recovering a sense of the dignity of womanhood?
/The Economist/ points approvingly to modernization and societies
which have abortion on demand but no sex-selection abortion crisis.
Putting aside the fact they acknowledge that Chinese and
Japanese-Americans /are/ having recourse to sex-selection abortions,
these same "progressive" societies have embraced myriad
other assaults on female dignity: pornography, contraception,
"sex education" which teaches the objectification of the
human person, and so on.
If they are seriously proposing that the solution to the eradication
of women in the developing world is a more complete embrace of the
very ideology that has so obviously harmed women and men, then we must
point out the absurdity of this view as many times as it takes to sink
in.
Radical feminists willingly sacrifice the health and lives of mothers
on the altar of abortion-on-demand. It is only one step further to
stand by while unborn girls are killed for the "crime" of
being female. Some "pro-choice" feminists are understandably
uncomfortable with this, but they are trapped by their sinister
ideology which affirms that no one can tell anyone else their
"choice" to abort is wrong.
A turning point in my pro-life education regarding so-called
"women's rights" organizations came while attending a March
2007 meeting deep in the bowels of the United Nations headquarters in
New York. South Korea's government proposed that the full assembly of
the UN Commission on the Status of Women adopt a resolution to condemn
sex-selection abortion. The vast majority of international delegations
were initially favorable to this proposal; then the feminists
unleashed their fury.
The self-proclaimed "defenders of women" lobbied hard and
successfully to have the European Union and others abandon preborn
girls to their fate and kill the largely symbolic UN resolution. Their
logic was essentially this: If we accept that some abortions must be
stopped, then all abortions are in danger, and our goal is to spread,
not limit, abortion.
The way to end sex-selection abortion is to convince the world of the
truth about the human person. All children are created in the very
image of God, and as such have profound dignity and a right to life
regardless of what doctors, parents, society or the State
"choose." No PR campaign can compare with this Natural Law
standard when it comes to protecting the lives of unborn girls.
The lie that these feminist hypocrites are defending women or girls
must be exposed and denounced in the strongest possible ways. They are
defending abortion, period. They are not part of the solution - they
are part of the problem - and millions of girls' (and boys') lives are
being snuffed out every year because of them.
|